Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 44:1560-1565 (1969)
© 1969 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J. R.
Articles

Multiple Molecular Forms of Ficin—Evidence Against Autolysis as Explanation 1,2

Donald E. Kramer3 and John R. Whitaker

a Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616

While the total amount of proteolytic enzyme activity in the latex from Ficus carica varieties Kadota and Black Mission showed seasonal variation and was different between the 2 crops of figs in the latex collected at the same time and from the same tree, there is no difference in the number of multiple molecular forms of ficin present as demonstrated by chromatography on carboxymethyl-cellulose. The number of multiple forms of ficin is also the same, with 1 exception, among samples of latex which have been collected with no protection against proteolysis, samples which have been collected directly into sodium p-chloromercuribenzoate to inhibit all proteolysis and samples which have been held at an elevated temperature so as to encourage proteolysis. Evidence is presented to support the proposal that component C of Ficus carica variety Kadota is not present in the original latex but that it is produced from component D during the purification procedure. The data support the hypothesis that, with the possible exception of 1 component, the multiple molecular forms of ficin are not the result of artifacts produced by autolysis during collection, storage and purification of the sample.


3 Present address: Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Technological Research Laboratory, 6640 N. W. Marine Drive, Vancouver 8, B. C., Canada.

1 This investigation was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (GM-05216).

2 Taken in part from the dissertation submitted by Donald E. Kramer to the Graduate Division, University of California, Davis in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Plant Biologists