Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 44:1566-1573 (1969)
© 1969 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J. R.
Articles

Nature of the Conversion of Ficus carica Variety Kadota Ficin Component D to Component C. Some Physicochemical Properties of Components C and D 1,2

Donald E. Kramer3 and John R. Whitaker

a Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Component C can be formed from component D under the experimental conditions used during purification of Ficus carica variety Kadota latex. By use of the inhibitor, sodium p-chloromercuribenzoate, the 2 components have been purified to chromatographic homogeneity. The 2 components have identical molecular weights and amino acid composition. The only difference found between the 2 components is the presence of 3 to 6 more amide groups in component D than in component C. There also appears to be a conformational difference between the 2 since component C is not as acidic, with respect to component D, as would be expected from the comparative amide contents. Conformational differences between the 2 are also indicated by the chromatographic behavior of the 2 in the presence and absence of sodium-p-chloromercuribenzoate.


3 Present address: Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Technological Research Laboratory, 6640 N. W. Marine Drive, Vancouver 8, B. C., Canada.

1 This investigation was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (GM-05216).

2 Taken in part from the dissertation submitted by Donald E. Kramer to the Graduate Division, University of California Davis, in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. A preliminary account of a portion of this work was presented at the Pacific Slope Biochemical Conference (Los Angeles, Sept. 2-3, 1965) and an abstract dealing with some phases of the work appears in Federation Proc. 26: 838 (1967).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Plant Biologists