Plant Physiol. EPICENTRE Biotechnologies
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 45:139-142 (1970)
© 1970 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bunt, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bunt, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bunt, J. S.
Articles

Some Observations on the Carbon Dioxide Burst in Chlorella and Chlamydomonas1

J. S. Bunt

a Division of Functional Biology, Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33149

In the course of mass spectrometer studies with the algae Chlorella and Chlamydomonas, data were obtained which indicate that the CO2 burst and gulp are sensitive to oxygen. Furthermore, the CO2 burst was found to be strongly suppressed when wave lengths shorter than 460 nanometers were blocked at intensities adequate to saturate photosynthesis. Under appropriate conditions at 30°, the CO2 burst was interrupted by a brief CO2 gulp and the post illumination gulp by a brief burst of CO2. The post illumination gulp of CO2 could be induced during illumination by interposition of a filter blocking wave lengths shorter than 460 nanometers. These data are discussed in relation to earlier reports of the phenomenon and briefly as they affect the detection of photorespiration.


1 Contribution No. 1156 from the Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami. This investigation was supported by National Science Foundation Grant GB6896 and by the Research Institute for Advanced Studies, Baltimore, where the experimental work was carried out. I wish to thank Dr. B. Kok, Dr. G. Cheniae, and Dr. M. Schwartz for valued discussions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Plant Biologists