Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 45:390-394 (1970)
© 1970 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (72)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Weiser, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Weiser, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Weiser, C. J.
Articles

The Environmental Control of Cold Acclimation in Apple 1

Gordon S. Howell2 and C. J. Weiser

a Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

The role of photoperiod and temperature in the cold acclimation of living Haralson apple (Pyrus malus L.) bark was studied in the autumn under field conditions in Minnesota. Whole trees, or different parts of the same tree, were exposed to either natural conditions, artifically lengthened days, or artificially warmed nights, or they were subjected to manual leaf removal. The results indicate that acclimation occurs in two stages which are induced by short days and frost (or low temperature), respectively. Leaves were stimulated by short days to produce translocatable substance(s) which promoted cold acclimation of the living bark. Leaves of plants grown under long days were the source of a translocatable substance(s) which inhibited acclimation. The second stage of hardiness, induced by frost (or low temperature), did not involve translocatable factors.

Inductive short days could overcome the effect of high temperatures, and low temperatures could overcome the effect of noninductive long days in promoting the first stage of acclimation to –30 C. Frost was necessary for maximum hardiness to –55 C. Plants grown in a greenhouse, in the autumn, under long days and high temperatures acclimated slightly in spite of the noninductive conditions. Short days and frost (or low temperatures) appeared to regulate different and independent endogenous acclimation processes.


2 Present address: Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48912.

1 Scientific Journal Series Paper 6937 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Welling, P. Rinne, A. Vihera-Aarnio, S. Kontunen-Soppela, P. Heino, and E. T. Palva
Photoperiod and temperature differentially regulate the expression of two dehydrin genes during overwintering of birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.)
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2004; 55(396): 507 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
D. T. Karlson, Y. Zeng, V. E. Stirm, R. J. Joly, and E. N. Ashworth
Photoperiodic Regulation of a 24-kD Dehydrin-Like Protein in Red-Osier Dogwood (Cornus sericea L.) in Relation to Freeze-Tolerance
Plant Cell Physiol., January 15, 2003; 44(1): 25 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Plant Biologists