This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Drumm, H. E. Articles by Margulies, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Drumm, H. E. Articles by Margulies, M. M. Agricola Articles by Drumm, H. E. Articles by Margulies, M. M.

Articles

In Vitro Protein Synthesis by Plastids of Phaseolus vulgaris

IV. Amino Acid Incorporation by Etioplasts and Effect of Illumination of Leaves on Incorporation by Plastids ¹

^a Radiation Biology Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560

Protein synthesis in vitro by etioplasts and chloroplasts from Phaseolus vulgaris was examined to study the factors regulating the development of etioplasts into chloroplasts. The properties of incorporation of ¹⁴C-leucine into protein by etioplasts from plants grown 6.5 days in darkness are similar to those of chloroplasts from plants of the same age that were illuminated for 12 hours. However, the rate of incorporation per plastid by chloroplasts is 4 times higher than the rate of amino acid incorporation by etioplasts. When 6-day-old plants are placed in light, this 4-fold increase occurs within 6 hours and is maintained up to 36 hours. The difference in rate of amino acid incorporation into protein between etioplasts and chloroplasts represents a real difference in the ability of etioplasts and chloroplasts to synthesize protein. A difference in pool size of leucine between etioplasts and chloroplasts does not account for the difference in amino acid incorporation between etioplasts and chloroplasts. Also the difference in photosynthetic capabilities of etioplasts and chloroplasts does not account for the difference in the ability to incorporate amino acid into protein. Furthermore, there are no factors in homogenates of etiolated leaves which inactivate amino acid incorporation into protein by chloroplasts. The difference in rates of amino acid incorporation between etioplasts and chloroplasts is correlated with the state of development of the plastids. The plastids have increased ability to incorporate amino acid into protein when the plastids are undergoing growth and differentiation.

¹ Published with the approval of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Research was supported in part by Smithsonian Research Foundation Grants Sg0400004 and Sg0400004/C1.