Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 46:324-330 (1970)
© 1970 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (67)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, F. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, F. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Drake, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Salisbury, F. B.
Articles

Temperature and Transpiration Resistances of Xanthium Leaves as Affected by Air Temperature, Humidity, and Wind Speed 1

B. G. Drake2, K. Raschke2 and F. B. Salisbury3

Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, Plant Science Department, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84321

Transpiration and temperatures of single, attached leaves of Xanthium strumarium L. were measured in high intensity white light (1.2 calories per square centimeter per minute on a surface normal to the radiation), with abundant water supply, at wind speeds of 90, 225, and 450 centimeters per second, and during exposure to moist and dry air. Partitioning of absorbed radiation between transpiration and convection was determined, and transpiration resistances were computed.

Leaf resistances decreased with increasing temperature (down to a minimum of 0.36 seconds per centimeter). Silicone rubber replicas of leaf surfaces proved that the decrease was due to increased stomatal apertures. At constant air temperature, leaf resistances were higher in dry than in moist air with the result that transpiration varied less than would have been predicted on the basis of the water-vapor pressure difference between leaf and air.

The dependence of stomatal conductance on temperature and moisture content of the air caused the following effects. At air temperatures below 35 C, average leaf temperatures were above air temperature by an amount dependent on wind velocity; increasing wind diminished transpiration. At air temperatures above 35 C, leaf temperatures were below air temperatures, and increasing wind markedly increased transpiration. Leaf temperatures equaled air temperature near 35 C at all wind speeds and in moist as well as in dry air.


2 Present address: MSU/AEC Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich. 48823

3 Present address: Department of Plant Science, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84321.

1 This work in part submitted as a Master's Thesis by the senior author and supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grants NSG-78-60 and NGR 45-002-068.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. D. Sharkey, A. E. Wiberley, and A. R. Donohue
Isoprene Emission from Plants: Why and How
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 5 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SIMULATIONHome page
L. H. Tichenor
Modular simulation of the static portion of the leaf energy budget
SIMULATION, December 1, 1990; 55(6): 345 - 351.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. K. SMITH
Temperatures of Desert Plants: Another Perspective on the Adaptability of Leaf Size
Science, August 18, 1978; 201(4356): 614 - 616.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Plant Biologists