Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 47:393-399 (1971)
© 1971 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (42)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, W. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, W. H.
Articles

Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh

Threshold Intensities and Blue-Far-red Synergism in Floral Induction 1,2

J. A. M. Brown3 and W. H. Klein

a Radiation Biology Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, Rockville, Maryland 20852

Arabidopsis seeds were germinated on sterile mineral agar supplemented with 1% glucose and cultured under continuous light regimes. With 4-hour incandescent plus 20-hour monochromatic illumination in the region from 400 to 485 nanometers there was effective floral induction at an intensity of 100 microwatts per square centimeter. Exclusion of far red wave lengths from the 4-hour incandescent period sharply reduced the effectiveness of subsequent monochromatic blue light in promoting floral induction. Delayed floral induction occurred under continuous incandescent light lacking far red and was attributable to the blue wave lengths. Continuous 485 nanometer (100 microwatts per square centimeter) exposure without any white light treatment during the postgermination growth period was ineffective in floral induction and meristem development. Light at 730 nanometers under the same conditions was partially effective, whereas energy between 500 and 700 nanometers was completely ineffective. When continuous monochromatic light at a 3-fold higher energy level was administered, all photomorphogenic responses were accomplished with 485 nanometer light, including germination and 100% floral induction without any white light treatment at any time during the experiment. Almost equal quantum effectiveness was calculated when equivalent quantum flux densities in the region from 710 to 740 nanometers or at 485 nanometers were used. It is postulated that floral induction in Arabidopsis may be the result of a continuous excitation of a stable form of far red-absorbing phytochrome localized in or on a membrane, and that excitation can be either by direct absorption of energy by far red-absorbing phytochrome or by transfer from an accessory pigment.


3 Present address: Biology Department, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556.

1 Published with the approval of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Research carried out during tenure of the National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council Senior Smithsonian Associateship awarded to J. A. M. B.

2 Research was supported in part by funds provided by United States Atomic Energy Commission Contract AT(30-1) 2373.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
F. Valverde, A. Mouradov, W. Soppe, D. Ravenscroft, A. Samach, and G. Coupland
Photoreceptor Regulation of CONSTANS Protein in Photoperiodic Flowering
Science, February 13, 2004; 303(5660): 1003 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
T. Mockler, H Guo, H Yang, H Duong, and C Lin
Antagonistic actions of Arabidopsis cryptochromes and phytochrome B in the regulation of floral induction
Development, January 5, 1999; 126(10): 2073 - 2082.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Pineiro and G. Coupland
The Control of Flowering Time and Floral Identity in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, May 1, 1998; 117(1): 1 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Guo, H. Yang, T. C. Mockler, and C. Lin
Regulation of Flowering Time by Arabidopsis Photoreceptors
Science, February 27, 1998; 279(5355): 1360 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Plant Biologists