Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 47:551-554 (1971)
© 1971 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galsky, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lippincott, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galsky, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lippincott, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Galsky, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lippincott, J. A.
Articles

Induction of {alpha}-Amylase in Barley Endosperm by Substrate Levels of Glutamate and Aspartate 1

Alan G. Galsky2 and James A. Lippincott

a Department of Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201

Incubation of embryoless barley (Hordeum vulgare) half-seeds for 24 hours with 0.1 M glutamate or aspartate resulted in the release of 17 to 48% as much {alpha}-amylase as did incubation with 260 mµM gibberellin. With incubation periods of 48 to 51 hours these amino acids were on the average about half as active as response-saturating concentrations of gibberellin, and in some experiments they were essentially as active. Citric acid cycle intermediates, glycolytic pathway intermediates, and cofactors of these pathways failed to induce {alpha}-amylase synthesis, while the following compounds were active: asparagine, homoserine, diaminopimelate, isoleucine, methionine, glutamine, ornithine, citrulline, argininosuccinate, and {delta}-aminolevulinate. However, threonine, lysine, {beta}-alanine, alanine, {gamma}-aminobutyrate, {alpha}-ketobutyrate, proline, arginine, glycine, leucine, and putrescine were inactive. Two patterns were noted in the list of active and inactive compounds: (a) all of the active compounds contain an amino group and are biosynthetically derived from citric acid cycle intermediates; and (b) biosynthetic precursors of the amino acids arginine, proline, threonine, and lysine were active whereas these amino acids were not.


2 Present address: Department of Biology, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois 61606.

1 This investigation was supported by United States Public Health Service Research Grant CA-05387 from the National Cancer Institute and by National Science Foundation Grant GU-3320.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Plant Biologists