This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (93) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sanchez-Diaz, M. F. Articles by Kramer, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sanchez-Diaz, M. F. Articles by Kramer, P. J. Agricola Articles by Sanchez-Diaz, M. F. Articles by Kramer, P. J.

Articles

Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery ¹

^a Department of Botany, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706

Corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum vulgare, Pers.) plants were grown in a vermiculite-gravel mixture in controlled environment chambers until they were 40 days old. Water was withheld until they were severely wilted, and they were then rewatered. During drying and after rewatering stomatal resistance was measured with a diffusion porometer each morning, and water saturation deficit and water potential were measured on leaf samples. The average resistance of the lower epidermis of well watered plants was lower for corn than for sorghum. When water stress developed, the stomata began to close at a higher water potential in corn than in sorghum. The stomata of both species began to reopen normally soon after the wilted plants were rewatered, and on the 2nd day the leaf resistances were nearly as low as those of the controls. The average leaf water potential of well watered corn was –4.5 bars; that of sorghum, –6.4 bars. The lowest leaf water potential in stressed corn was –12.8 bars at a water saturation deficit of 45%. The lowest leaf water potential in stressed sorghum was –15.7 bars, but the water saturation deficit was only 29%. At these values the leaves of both species were tightly rolled or folded and some injury was apparent. Thus, although the average leaf resistance of corn is little lower than that of sorghum, corn loses much more of its water before the stomata are fully closed than does sorghum. The smaller reduction in water content of sorghum for a given reduction in leaf water potential is characteristic of drought-resistant species.

¹ This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grants GB-8157 and GB-7153.