Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 50:698-701 (1972)
© 1972 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (95)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cedeno-Maldonado, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heath, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cedeno-Maldonado, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heath, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cedeno-Maldonado, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heath, R. L.
Articles

The Cupric Ion as an Inhibitor of Photosynthetic Electron Transport in Isolated Chloroplasts 1

Arturo Cedeno-Maldonadoa and J. A. Swadera

Robert L. Heathb

a Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92502, Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92502

Strong inhibition of uncoupled photosynthetic electron transport by Cu2+ in isolated spinach chloroplasts was observed by measuring changes in O2 concentration in the reaction medium. Inhibition was dependent not only on the concentration of the inhibitor, but also on the ratio of chlorophyll to inhibitor. Binding of Cu2+ to the chloroplast membranes resulted in removal of Cu2+ from solution. When chloroplasts were exposed to preincubation in light, there was increased inhibition as a result of Cu2+ binding to inhibitory sites. Preincubation in the dark resulted in Cu2+ binding to noninhibitory sites and decreased inhibition. The degree of inhibition was lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities.

When the photosystems were assayed separately, photosystem I was more resistant to inhibition than photosystem II. The most sensitive site to the inhibitor was the oxidizing side of photosystem II.


1 This investigation was supported (in part) by Training Grant ES00084 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Kupper, B. Gotz, A. Mijovilovich, F. C. Kupper, and W. Meyer-Klaucke
Complexation and Toxicity of Copper in Higher Plants. I. Characterization of Copper Accumulation, Speciation, and Toxicity in Crassula helmsii as a New Copper Accumulator
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2009; 151(2): 702 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. Patsikka, M. Kairavuo, F. Sersen, E.-M. Aro, and E. Tyystjarvi
Excess Copper Predisposes Photosystem II to Photoinhibition in Vivo by Outcompeting Iron and Causing Decrease in Leaf Chlorophyll
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2002; 129(3): 1359 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. Pätsikkä, E.-M. Aro, and E. Tyystjärvi
Increase in the Quantum Yield of Photoinhibition Contributes to Copper Toxicity in Vivo
Plant Physiology, June 1, 1998; 117(2): 619 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Plant Biologists