Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 51:478-480 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evert, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evert, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Evert, D. R.
Articles

Factors Affecting Electrical Impedance of Internodal Stem Sections 1

Dean R. Evert

a Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401

A sample holder was designed and built to facilitate measuring the magnitude and phase angle of the electrical impedance of internodal stem sections from Cornus stolonifera Michx. A nonpolarizing, electrically conducting manganese dioxidecarbon paste used between the stem sample and the electrodes of the sample holder allowed measurement of impedance at frequencies from 50 hertz to 500 kilohertz without electrode polarization or electrical interference. The impedance magnitude was linearly dependent on the sample length, but this dependence was minimized by computing a normalized impedance magnitude. The normalized impedance magnitude (Znf) was calculated using the impedance magnitude (Z) at any specified frequency (f) and the impedance magnitude at 500 kilohertz (Z500 kHz) in the following formula: Znf = (Z - Z500 kHz)/Z500 kHz. The normalized impedance magnitude was sensitive to injury produced by boiling and peeling the sample. Electrical impedance measurements on the bark and wood separately demonstrated that they have different electrical properties.


1 University of Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Article 293.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Plant Biologists