This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yopp, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yopp, J. H. Agricola Articles by Yopp, J. H.

Articles

The Role of Light and Growth Regulators in the Opening of the Dentaria Petiolar Hook

¹ Department of Botany, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901

The phenomenon of the etiolated hook is not restricted to the hypocotyl of the dicotyledenous plant (e.g., Phaseolus) but appears to serve a similar, adaptive function in the petioles of certain rhizomatous plants. The commonly employed regulants of hypocotyl hook opening were tested for their effect on the petiolar hook of Dentaria diphylla. The hook was found to require both light (red light promoted, far red inhibited) and the intact leaf for opening. The leaf requirement was fully replaced by gibberellic acid (0.04% in lanolin) but only in light; cobalt chloride (0.1-1.0 mM) promoted a partial opening in dark with or without leaf; and coumarin (1 mM), indoleacetic acid (1-4% in lanolin), and ethylene 10 microliter per liter all inhibited opening of hooks with or without lamina. The absolute requirement for light and leaf tissue and the replacement of proximal tissue by GA₃ alone represent marked differences in the physiology of hypocotyl and petiolar hooks. These differences are believed to indicate the necessity for concomitant leaf maturation in petiolar hook opening.