Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 51:828-832 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welch, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welch, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Welch, R. M.
Articles

Vanadium Uptake by Plants

Absorption Kinetics and the Effects of pH, Metabolic Inhibitors, and Other Anions and Cations 1

Ross M. Welch

United States Plant, Soil and Nutrition Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Tower Road, Ithaca, New York 14850, Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

The kinetics of vanadium absorption by excised barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Eire) roots were investigated with respect to ionic species of V in solution, time and concentration dependence, Ca sensitivity, and interaction with various anions, cations, and pH levels. The role of metabolism in V absorption was also studied using anaerobic treatment (N2 gas) and chemical inhibitors (NaN3, KCN, or 2,4-dinitrophenol). Approximately one-third of the labeled V initially taken up by excised roots was desorbed to a constant level after 45 min in unlabeled V solutions. The rate of absorption of labeled V from 5 µM NH4VO3 solutions containing 0.5 mM CaSO4 was constant for at least 3 hours. Omission of Ca resulted in a 72% reduction in V uptake when compared to controls with 0.5 mM CaSO4. The rate of uptake of V was highest at pH 4 but dropped to a very low level at pH 10. It was relatively constant between the pH levels of 5 and 8 at which the VO3 ion is the predominant ionic species in solution. The rate of absorption of V was followed as a function of concentrations from 0.5 to 100 µM NH4VO3. It was found to be a linear function of concentration and did not follow saturation kinetics. Absorption experiments carried out with labeled V from either NaVO3 or NH4VO3 sources gave similar results. No anion studied (i.e. HPO42–, HAsO42–, MoO42–, SeO42–, SeO32–, CrO42–, BO33–, No3, and Cl) interfered appreciably (i.e. less than 30% inhibition) with the absorption of labeled V. Anaerobic treatment of absorption solution with N2 gas did not inhibit V absorption by excised roots. The results obtained using chemical inhibitors were not consistent. It was concluded that V is not actively absorbed by excised barley roots.


1 Cornell University, Department of Agronomy Paper No. 1006.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Plant Biologists