Plant Physiol. EPICENTRE Biotechnologies
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 51:993-997 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Articles

Chloroplast Response to Low Leaf Water Potentials

II. Role of Osmotic Potential 1

J. R. Potter2 and J. S. Boyer

a Departments of Botany and Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Electron transport in chloroplasts isolated from desiccated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. Russian Mammoth) leaves was compared with electron transport in sunflower chloroplasts in sorbitol-containing media having various osmotic potentials. In media having low osmotic potentials and dichloroindophenol as electron acceptor, the activity for electron transport was inhibited, but the inhibition was much less than that due to comparable desiccation in vivo. The inhibition at low osmotic potentials was rapidly reversed by returning the chloroplasts to media having high osmotic potentials, but the activity of chloroplasts from desiccated tissue showed no reversal when the chloroplasts were placed in media having high osmotic potentials. Nevertheless, the inhibition of chloroplast activity due to desiccation in vivo was basically reversible, because chloroplasts recovered quickly when they were rehydrated in vivo. The large differences between desiccation in vivo and exposure to low osmotic potential in vivo indicate that osmotic solutions did not reproduce the effects of tissue desiccation. It is concluded that decreases in the Gibbs free energy of water due to decreased osmotic potentials probably have only a small effect on electron transport in chloroplasts from desiccated tissue and do not account for the major effects of leaf desiccation on electron transport.


2 Present Address: Southern Weed Science Laboratory, Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Miss. 38776.

1 This work was supported by Grant B-036-ILL from the Office of Water Resources Research, United States Department of Interior.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. S. Boyer and M. E. Westgate
Grain yields with limited water
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2004; 55(407): 2385 - 2394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A.-C. TANG, Y. KAWAMITSU, M. KANECHI, and J. S. BOYER
Photosynthetic Oxygen Evolution at Low Water Potential in Leaf Discs Lacking an Epidermis
Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 861 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Plant Biologists