This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (37) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bazzaz, M. B. Articles by Govindjee Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bazzaz, M. B. Articles by Govindjee, Agricola Articles by Bazzaz, M. B. Articles by Govindjee,

Articles

Photochemical Properties of Mesophyll and Bundle Sheath Chloroplasts of Maize ¹

^a Department of Botany, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Several photochemical and spectral properties of maize (Zea mays) bundle sheath and mesophyll chloroplasts are reported that provide a better understanding of the photosynthetic apparatus of C₄ plants. The difference absorption spectrum at 298 K and the fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of chlorophyll at 298 K and 77 K provide new information on the different forms of chlorophyll a in bundle sheath and mesophyll chloroplasts: the former contain, relative to short wavelength chlorophyll a forms, more long wavelength chlorophyll a form (e.g. chlorophyll a 693 and chlorophyll a 705) and less chlorophyll b than the latter. The degree of polarization of chlorophyll a fluorescence is 6% in bundle sheath and 4% in mesophyll chloroplasts. This result is consistent with the presence of relatively high amounts of oriented long wavelength forms of chlorophyll a in bundle sheath compared to mesophyll chloroplasts. The relative yield of variable, with respect to constant, chorophyll a fluorescence in mesophyll chloroplasts is more than twice that in bundle sheath chloroplast. Furthermore, the relative yield of total chlorophyll a fluorescence is 40% lower in bundle sheath compared to that in mesophyll chloroplasts. This is in agreement with the presence of the higher ratio of the weakly fluorescent pigment system I to pigment system II in bundle sheath than in mesophyll chloroplast. The efficiency of energy transfer from chlorophyll b and carotenoids to chlorophyll a are calculated to be 100 and 50%, respectively, in both types of chloroplasts. Fluorescence quenching of atebrin, reflecting high energy state of chloroplasts, is 10 times higher in mesophyll chloroplasts than in bundle sheath chloroplasts during noncyclic electron flow but is equal during cyclic flow. The entire electron transport chain is shown to be present in both types of chloroplasts, as inferred from the antagonistic effect of red (650 nm) and far red (710 nm) lights on the absorbance changes at 559 nm and 553 nm, and the photoreduction of methyl viologen from H₂O. (The rate of methyl viologen photoreduction in bundle sheath chloroplasts was 40% of that of mesophyll chloroplasts.)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. L. MOORE, A. JOY, R. TOM, D. GUST, T. A. MOORE, R. V. BENSASSON, and E. J. LAND Photoprotection by Carotenoids During Photosynthesis: Motional Dependence of Intramolecular Energy Transfer Science, May 28, 1982; 216(4549): 982 - 984. [Abstract] [PDF]