Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 52:440-442 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (42)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasperbauer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Peaslee, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasperbauer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Peaslee, D. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kasperbauer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Peaslee, D. E.
Articles

Morphology and Photosynthetic Efficiency of Tobacco Leaves That Received End-of-Day Red and Far Red Light during Development 1

M. J. Kasperbauer and D. E. Peaslee

a Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, and Department of Agronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506

Shaded leaves in plant canopies receive a higher proportion of far red relative to red light than is received by unshaded leaves. Brief end-of-day irradiations with red or far red light, acting through the phytochrome system, reversibly control morphological development of tobacco plants. Leaves that received far red light for 5 minutes at the end of each day during development were longer and narrower than those that received end-of-day red light. The far red treated leaves weighed less, had fewer stomata, and had less chlorophyll per unit area of leaf. Net CO2 assimilation rates did not differ significantly between red- and far red-treated leaves on an area basis; however, the far red-treated leaves assimilated significantly more CO2 on a leaf weight basis.


1 This is a cooperative project of the Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture and the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of both agencies (USDA-ARS No. PS-73-130 and Ky. No. 73-3-20).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
E. Frak, X. Le Roux, P. Millard, B. Adam, E. Dreyer, C. Escuit, H. Sinoquet, M. Vandame, and C. Varlet-Grancher
Spatial distribution of leaf nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity within the foliage of individual trees: disentangling the effects of local light quality, leaf irradiance, and transpiration
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2002; 53(378): 2207 - 2216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. F. Antonious and M. J. Kasperbauer
Color of Light Reflected to Leaves Modifies Nutrient Content of Carrot Roots
Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1211 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Plant Biologists