This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (51) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Christy, A. L. Articles by Ferrier, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Christy, A. L. Articles by Ferrier, J. M. Agricola Articles by Christy, A. L. Articles by Ferrier, J. M.

Articles

A Mathematical Treatment of Munch's Pressure-Flow Hypothesis of Phloem Translocation ^1,2

^a Department of Botany, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210

The steady state solutions of two mathematical models are used to evaluate Münch's pressure-flow hypothesis of phloem translocation. The models assume a continuous active loading and unloading of translocate but differ in the site of loading and unloading and the route of water to the sieve tube. The dimensions of the translocation system taken are the average observed values for sugar beet and are intended to simulate translocation from a mature source leaf to an expanding sink leaf. The volume flow rate of solution along the sieve tube, water flow rate into the sieve tube, hydrostatic pressure, and concentration of sucrose in the sieve tube are obtained from a numerical computer solution of the models. The mass transfer rate, velocity of translocation, and osmotic and hydrostatic pressures are consistent with empirical findings. Owing to the resistance to water flow offered by the lateral membranes, the hydrostatic pressure generated by the osmotic pressure can be considerably less than would be predicted by the solute concentration. These models suggest that translocation at observed rates and velocities can be driven by a water potential difference between the sieve tube and surrounding tissue and are consistent with the pressure-flow hypothesis of translocation.

⁴ Present address: Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, O. 43210.

¹ A portion of this work was conducted at the Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.

² Paper 837 from the Department of Botany, Ohio State University, Columbus, O.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Cernusak, D. J. Arthur, J. S. Pate, and G. D. Farquhar Water Relations Link Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Discrimination to Phloem Sap Sugar Concentration in Eucalyptus globulus Plant Physiology, April 1, 2003; 131(4): 1544 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Bancal and F. Soltani Source-sink partitioning. Do we need Munch? J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2002; 53(376): 1919 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.M. Henton, A.J. Greaves, G.J. Piller, and P.E.H. Minchin Revisiting the Munch pressure-flow hypothesis for long-distance transport of carbohydrates: modelling the dynamics of solute transport inside a semipermeable tube J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2002; 53(373): 1411 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]