Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 53:307-311 (1974)
© 1974 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glinka, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glinka, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Glinka, Z.
Articles

Fluxes of a Nonelectrolyte and Compartmentation in Cells of Carrot Root Tissue

Z. Glinka

Department of Botany, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Permeation of thiourea into cells of carrot (Daucus carota L.) storage root discs was found to be governed by its concentration gradient only. The analysis of the course of thiourea efflux from preloaded discs shows two distinct exponential curves, apart from an initial very fast component. Reasons are given for relating the first exponential part of the curve to efflux from the cytoplasm and the second exponential part to efflux from the vacuole.

The rate constant for thiourea efflux through the tonoplast is markedly temperature-dependent (activation energy 13.2 kcal mole) and is lowered by 2,4-dinitrophenol and by phenyl mercuric acetate treatments. The rate constant for its efflux through the plasmalemma, on the other hand, has a low activation energy (4.2 kcal mole), which is equal to that of free diffusion of thiourea in aqueous solution, and is not affected by the metabolic inhibitors. Possible reasons for the difference in the properties of the two membranes are discussed.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Plant Biologists