Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 55:110-111 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doss, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doss, R. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Doss, R. P.
Articles

Influence of Timing and Number of Consecutive Inductive Photoperiodic Cycles on the Flowering of Lemna1,2

Robert P. Doss3

a Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Requirements for flowering of the short day plant Lemna perpusilla Torr. strain 6746 can be studied by interposition of varying numbers of consecutive short days during 7 days of continuous light. A single inductive cycle can cause the formation of few flowers if it comes during the middle of a 7-day period of continuous light. Three inductive cycles cause 30% or more of the fronds to flower if the cycles are properly spaced in the 7-day period. The fact that timing of the inductive photoperiodic cycles is critical indicates the importance of development time and abortion of evoked floral primordia in the flowering response. These results are particularly useful in studies of processes occurring during induction.


3 National Defense Education Act predoctoral fellow.

1 This research was supported in part by a Chancellor's Patent Fund Grant and a Priority C Research Grant, University of California, Davis.

2 A portion of this report is taken from a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree in Plant Physiology at the University of California, Davis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Plant Biologists