Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 55:178-182 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (72)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radin, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radin, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Radin, J. W.
Articles

Differential Regulation of Nitrate Reductase Induction in Roots and Shoots of Cotton Plants 1

John W. Radin

a Western Cotton Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Phoenix, Arizona 85040

The induction of nitrate reductase activity in root tips of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was regulated by several amino acids and by ammonium. Glycine, glutamine, and asparagine strongly inhibited induction of activity by nitrate and also decreased growth of sterile-cultured roots on a nitrate medium. Methionine, serine, and alanine weakly inhibited induction, and 11 other amino acids had little or no effect. Ammonium also decreased induction in root tips, but was most effective only at pH 7 or higher. The optimum conditions for ammonium regulation of induction were identical to those for growth of sterile-cultured roots on ammonium as the sole nitrogen source. Aspartate and glutamate strongly stimulated induction, but several lines of evidence indicated that the mechanism of this response was different from that elicited by the other amino acids. The effects of amino acids on induction appeared to be independent of nitrate uptake.

In green shoot tissues, all attempts to demonstrate regulation of induction by amino acids failed. The great difference in observed responses of root and shoot to amino acids suggests that their nitrate reductase activities are regulated differently. Differential regulation of this enzyme is consistent with the responses of root and shoot nitrate reductase activity to nitrate.


1 Contribution of the Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, in cooperation with the Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station. Journal Paper 2290 of the Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. J. Kronzucker, M. Y. Siddiqi, A. D.M. Glass, and G. J.D. Kirk
Nitrate-Ammonium Synergism in Rice. A Subcellular Flux Analysis
Plant Physiology, March 1, 1999; 119(3): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Plant Biologists