Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 55:218-222 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGlasson, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tigchelaar, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGlasson, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tigchelaar, E. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McGlasson, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tigchelaar, E. C.
Articles

Comparison of Propylene-induced Responses of Immature Fruit of Normal and rin Mutant Tomatoes 1,2

William B. McGlasson3, Herbert C. Dostal and Edward C. Tigchelaar

a Department of Horticulture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Continuous application of propylene to 40 to 80% mature fruits of normal tomato strains (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) advanced ripening in fruits of all ages by at least 50%. Although preclimacteric respiration was stimulated by propylene treatment, there was no concomitant increase in ethylene production. Once ripening commenced, the rates of endogenous ethylene production were similar in both propylene-treated and untreated fruits. Continuous exposure to propylene also stimulated respiration in immature fruits of rin, a nonripening mutant. Although respiration reached rates similar to those during the climacteric of comparable normal fruits there was no change in endogenous ethylene production which remained at a low level. Internal ethylene concentrations in attached 45 to 75% mature fruits of rin and a normal strain were similar. It is suggested that the onset of ripening in normal tomato fruit is not controlled by endogenous ethylene, although increased ethylene production is probably an integral part of the ripening processes.


3 This research was completed while W. B. McG. was on leave from the Plant Physiology Unit, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Division of Food Research, and School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University. North Ryde 2113. Sydney, Australia.

1 This research was supported by a contract grant from General Foods, Inc., Technical Center, White Plains, N.Y. and by Grant GB 27520 from the National Science Foundation to E.C.T.

2 Journal Paper No. 5362. Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind. 47907.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. Cantu, B. Blanco-Ulate, L. Yang, J. M. Labavitch, A. B. Bennett, and A. L.T. Powell
Ripening-Regulated Susceptibility of Tomato Fruit to Botrytis cinerea Requires NOR But Not RIN or Ethylene
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2009; 150(3): 1434 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Food Science and Technology InternationalHome page
F.B. Flores, M.C. Martinez-Madrid, and F. Romojaro
Influence of Fruit Development Stage on the Physiological Response to Ethylene in Cantaloupe Charentais Melon
Food Science and Technology International, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 87 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Plant Biologists