This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (46) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Turner, N. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Turner, N. C. Agricola Articles by Turner, N. C.

Articles

Concurrent Comparisons of Stomatal Behavior, Water Status, and Evaporation of Maize in Soil at High or Low Water Potential

^a The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut 06504

Concurrent measurements of evaporation, leaf conductance, irradiance, leaf water potential, and osmotic potential of maize (Zea mays L. cv. Pa602A) in soil at either high or low soil water potential were compared at several hours on two consecutive days in July. Hourly evaporation, measured on two weighing lysimeters, was similar until 1000 hours Eastern Standard Time, but thereafter evaporation from the maize in the dry soil was always less than that in the wet soil; before noon it was 62% and by midafternoon, only 35% of that in the wet soil. The leaf water potential, measured with a pressure chamber, was between –1.2 and –2.5 bars and between –6.8 and –8 bars at sunrise (about 0530 hours Eastern Standard Time) in the plants in the wet and dry soil, respectively, but decreased quickly to between –8 and –13 bars in the plants in the wet soil and to less than –15 bars in the plants in the dry soil by 1100 to 1230 hours Eastern Standard Time. At this time, the leaf conductance of all leaves was less than 0.1 cm sec^–1 in the maize in the dry soil, whereas the conductance was 0.3 to 0.4 cm sec^–1 in the leaves near the top of the canopy in the wet soil. The osmotic potential, measured with a vapor pressure osmometer, also decreased during the morning but to a smaller degree than leaf water potential, so that by 1100 to 1230 hours Eastern Standard Time the leaf turgor potential was 1 to 2 bars in all plants. Thereafter, leaf turgor potential increased, particularly in the plants in soil at a high water potential, whereas leaf water potential continued to decrease even in the maize leaves with partly closed stomata. Evidently maize can have values of leaf conductance differing 3- to 4- fold at the same leaf turgor potential, which suggests that stomata do not respond primarily to bulk leaf turgor potential. Evidence for some osmotic adjustment in the plants at low soil water potential is presented. Although the degree of stomatal closure in the maize in dry soil did not prevent further development of stress, it did decrease evaporation in proportion to the decrease in canopy conductance.