Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 55:991-998 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, J. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, J. K.
Articles

Changes in Enzyme Regulation during Growth of Maize

I. Progressive Desensitization of Homoserine Dehydrogenase during Seedling Growth 1

Benjamin F. Matthews, Andrew W. Gurman2 and John K. Bryan

a Department of Biology, Biological Research Laboratories, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210

The sensitivity of homoserine dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.3) to inhibition by the feed-back modifier, L-threonine, was examined in preparations derived from etiolated shoots, roots, and lightgrown tissues of Zea mays L. var. earliking. A progressive decrease in enzyme sensitivity was observed during seedling growth. Enzyme derived from internode tissue retained a greater sensitivity to the effector than enzyme derived from apical portions of etiolated shoots, whereas enzyme from root tips was characteristically more sensitive than that prepared from mature cells of the root. Enzyme desensitization occurred rapidly during culture of excised shoots and the activities of both homoserine dehydrogenase and aspartokinase (EC 2.7.2.4) declined during shoot culture under a variety of conditions. The initial enzyme levels and the characteristic sensitivity of homoserine dehydrogenase were preserved during culture at 5 to 7 C, but desensitization was not prevented by inclusion of cycloheximide in the culture medium.

Results of control experiments provide evidence that desensitization occurs in vivo. No alteration of the enzyme properties was detected during extraction or concentration of sensitive or insensitive enzyme or during coextraction of enzyme from mixed populations of different age shoots; nor was a differential distribution of inhibitors or activators indicated during assay of mixed preparations. The change in enzyme sensitivity was apparent under a variety of assay conditions and was not accompanied by changes in the apparent affinity of the enzyme for the substrate, homoserine. It is suggested that systematic changes in the regulatory characteristics of certain enzymes could be an important level of metabolic regulation during cellular differentiation.

Three forms of maize homoserine dehydrogenaase were detected after acrylamide gel electrophoresis of samples derived from 72-hr shoots. Similar analysis of samples from older shoots revealed a broad asymmetric band of enzyme activity, suggesting that changes in the relative distribution of specific forms of the enzyme could be related to the growth-dependent changes in the sensitivity of maize homoserine dehydrogenase.


2 Present address: Department of Microbiology, The University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, N.Y. 14642.

1 This study was supported by National Science Foundation Grant 29599.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
X. Wang, D. K. Stumpf, and B. A. Larkins
Aspartate Kinase 2. A Candidate Gene of a Quantitative Trait Locus Influencing Free Amino Acid Content in Maize Endosperm
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2001; 125(4): 1778 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Plant Biologists