Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 56:478-480 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renosto, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Renosto, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Renosto, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, G.
Articles

Mechanism of Sulfate Transport Inhibition by Cycloheximide in Plant Tissues 1

Franco Renosto and Giovanni Ferrari

a Institute of Agricultural Chemistry, University of Padua, Padova Italy

Inhibition by cycloheximide of sulfate transport in both barley roots (Hordeum vulgare L.) and potato tuber (Solanum tuberosum L.) increases with increasing inhibitor concentration only to a limited extent, depending on the length of the tissue incubation with the inhibitor. In contrast to this, increasing concentrations of dinitrophenol have a rapid and total inhibitory effect on the active transport. Leucine transport in the same tissues is strongly inhibited by dinitrophenol but is not affected by cycloheximide, whereas incorporation into protein is mainly inhibited by cycloheximide. It appears that the mechanism of transport inhibition by cycloheximide in plant tissues consists in stopping new carrier synthesis and not in the disruption of energy flow. Sulfate carriers show comparable decay rates in barley roots and potato tuber, the mean life being shorter than that of the leucine carriers. These appear more stable in roots than in storage tissues.


1 This work was supported by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Plant Biologists