Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 57:358-364 (1976)
© 1976 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. K.
Articles

Morphology of Arabidopsis Grown under Chronic Centrifugation and on the Clinostat 1,2,3

Allan H. Brown, A. Orville Dahl and David K. Chapman

a Plant Centrifuge Laboratory, University City Science Center and Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19174

Morphological measurements were made on populations of Arabidopsis thaliana grown from seed for 21 days under essentially constant environmental conditions except for the influence of gravitational or centrifugal accelerations. Growth conditions were what had been proposed for experiments in an artificial satellite. Observations are reported for plants grown at normal 1-g upright or on horizontal clinostats and for plants grown on a centrifuge. Increased g-force, up to 15 times normal, was found to have significant but small effects on some morphological end points. The plants' sensitivity to the magnitude of the g-force was much less than to its vector direction.

Data from centrifuge experiments (which determined the g-functions for particular characters) were extrapolated to zero-g to predict a set of morphological characteristics of a plant developing in the satellite environment. As an alternative means of predicting properties of a zero-g plant, characteristics of plants grown on horizontal clinostats were measured. The results of these two predictive methods were not in agreement.

Clinostat grown plants were morphologically distinct from upright stationary controls. When plants were grown while rotating in the upright position on vertical clinostats they were similar to stationary plants also grown upright, but there were small differences some of which were statistically significant.


1 This work was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grants NGR 39-010-104 and NGR 39-010-149 to the University of Pennsylvania and by Grant NGR 39-030-010 to the University City Science Center. It also was supported by NASA contracts NAS 2-2432 and NAS 2-7730 to the University of Pennsylvania and NASW-2208 and NASW-2232 to the University City Science Center.

2 Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to the authors, Biology Department G-5, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. 19174.

3 This contribution has the identification, MORFOG-2, as a NASA contractor's technical report.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Allen, P. A. Bisbee, R. L. Darnell, A. Kuang, L. H. Levine, M. E. Musgrave, and J. J. W. A. van Loon
Gravity control of growth form in Brassica rapa and Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae): Consequences for secondary metabolism
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2009; 96(3): 652 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
K. J. Fitzelle and J. Z. Kiss
Restoration of gravitropic sensitivity in starch-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis by hypergravity
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2001; 52(355): 265 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1976 by the American Society of Plant Biologists