This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (83) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mohanty, P. Articles by Boyer, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mohanty, P. Articles by Boyer, J. S. Agricola Articles by Mohanty, P. Articles by Boyer, J. S.

Articles

Chloroplast Response to Low Leaf Water Potentials

IV. Quantum Yield Is Reduced ¹

^a Departments of Botany and Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Quantum yields were measured for CO₂ fixation by sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) leaves having various water potentials and for dichlorophenolindophenol photoreduction by chloroplasts isolated from similar leaves having various water potentials. In red radiation, the quantum yield for CO₂ was 0.076 for an attached sunflower leaf at a water potential of –3 to –4 bars but was 0.020 for the same leaf at –15.3 bars. After recovery to a water potential of –5 bars, the quantum yield rose to 0.060. Soybean (Glycine max L. [Merr.]) leaves behaved similarly. Chloroplasts from a sunflower leaf with a water potential of –3.6 bars had a quantum yield for 4 equivalents of 0.079, but when tissue from the same leaf had a water potential of –14.8 bars, the quantum yield of the chloroplasts decreased to 0.028. The decrease could not be attributed to differences in rates of respiration by the leaves or the chlorophyll content or absorption spectrum of the leaves and chloroplasts.

The data are the first to demonstrate an effect of low leaf water potential on the quantum yield and they indicate that changes occurred close to the primary photochemical events of photosynthesis. The similarity in response of the leaves and chloroplasts indicates that certain changes in photosynthesis at low water potentials are attributable to the chloroplasts rather than the stomata.

³ To whom requests for reprints should be sent.

¹ Research was supported by Grant B-036-ILL, Office of Water Resources and Technology, United States Department of Interior.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.-C. TANG, Y. KAWAMITSU, M. KANECHI, and J. S. BOYER Photosynthetic Oxygen Evolution at Low Water Potential in Leaf Discs Lacking an Epidermis Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 861 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]