Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 59:189-192 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Duffus, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Duffus, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Duffus, C. M.
Articles

Separation and Some Properties of Large and Small Amyloplasts throughout Development in Barley Endosperm

J. Margaret Williams and Carol M. Duffus

Department of Agricultural Biochemistry, School of Agriculture, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland

A method is described whereby amyloplasts from immature barley (Hordeum distichum L.) endosperm could be separated into two populations of large and small amyloplasts at all stages of development. The small amyloplasts had more amylopectin than the large at early stages, but by 60 days after anthesis, the large had the greater proportion of amylopectin. Starch synthetase activity was associated with both types of amyloplast. The nucleotide specificity of the starch synthetase associated with each population varied independently throughout development. At 25 days after anthesis, the large amyloplasts were more susceptible than the small to {alpha}-amylolysis; however, at 38 and 60 days, the small amyloplasts became more susceptible.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Plant Biologists