Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Plant Physiology 59:574-578 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parrish, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parrish, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Parrish, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. J.
Articles

On the Relationship between Extracellular pH and the Growth of Excised Pea Stem Segments

David J. Parrish1 and Peter J. Davies

a Section of Genetics, Development, and Physiology, Division of Biological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Studies with stem segments of peas (Pisum sativum L. var. Alaska) suggest that the pH of the medium bathing elongating tissue does not always reflect intramural (cell wall) conditions or that pH is not a controlling factor in elongation. Peeled, green segments, and peeled or nonpeeled etiolated segments appear to regulate the pH of their bathing medium causing it to become acidified with or without the addition of auxin. The growth rates of segments are greatest during a period before acidification is evident and slow during the time in which the medium becomes acidified. We cannot reproduce the dramatic auxin-induced pH shifts reported in the literature because the control segments are becoming more acid also; but there is some evidence that acidification may occur in response to auxin treatments. K+ additions mimic the acidifying tendency of auxin but are without growth-promoting effect. Emergent growth (an extremely rapid burst of growth following anaerobic treatments) is not accompanied by a drop in pH of the bathing medium. Proper aeration of the bathing medium in extracellular pH studies is crucial and may explain differences between our results and other published accounts. The data suggest that the techniques used for most extracellular pH studies may not very closely approximate in vivo conditions or properly reflect intramural H+ concentration fluxes.

1 Current address: Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb. 68583.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Plant Biologists