Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Plant Physiology 60:374-378 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stout, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cotts, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stout, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cotts, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stout, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cotts, R. M.
Articles

Quantitative Study of the Importance of Water Permeability in Plant Cold Hardiness

Darryl G. Stouta,1 and Peter L. Steponkusa,2

Robert M. Cottsb

a Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, b Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

The rate of ice formation was measured for Hedera helix L. cv. Thorndale (English ivy) bark exposed to –10 C. The cooling rate of bark exposed to –10 C was 31 C per minute. The water efflux rate required for ice formation to occur extracellularly was calculated from the rate of ice formation and the average cell diameter. The water potential difference driving the efflux of water to sites of extracellular ice was calculated from the sample temperature, osmotic water potential, and fraction of water frozen at a given freezing temperature. From the water efflux rate and water potential difference, the resistance of the barrier controlling movement of intracellular water to sites of extracellular ice was calculated. Comparison of the resistance of this barrier to water movement with the resistance of the cell membrane revealed that the membrane represented only 0.5% of the barrier resistance. Thus, membrane resistance can have little influence on the rate of water efflux and ice formation when bark is cooled at a rate of 31 C per minute. If ice formation occurred at the same rate in ivy bark as it occurred in a 10 mM MnCl2 solution, the membrane resistance would still have represented only 1% of the resistance of the barrier to ice formation. Therefore, at a cooling rate of 31 C/minute, heat removal plays a large part in determining the rate of ice formation. At slower cooling rates experienced under natural freezing conditions the ability to remove heat would play an even larger role. It is concluded that under natural freezing conditions membrane resistance does not limit water efflux.

1 Present address: Crop Science Department, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N OWO.

2 Present address: Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Plant Biologists