Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 60:684-688 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etherton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Spanswick, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Etherton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Spanswick, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Etherton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Spanswick, R. M.
Articles

Comparison of Three Methods for Measuring Electrical Resistances of Plant Cell Membranes 1

Bud Ethertona

David W. Keiferb and Roger M. Spanswickb

a Department of Botany, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, Section of Genetics, Development, and Physiology, Division of Biological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

The reliability of two different membrane resistance-measuring methods that use a single intracellular microelectrode was tested against a conventional method that uses two intracellular microelectrodes. The first single-electrode method used a single square current pulse and required a constant microelectrode resistance. This method was unreliable because the electrode resistance changed markedly on cell penetration and changed with time within the cell. The second method used a high frequency square wave for injecting current into the cell and depended upon the membrane having a much longer RC (resistance x capacitance)-time constant than the microelectrode. The resistance values obtained by this latter method were usually different from membrane resistances obtained at the same time on the same cells using two intracellular microelectrodes. Therefore, neither single intracellular microelectrode method was as reliable as the conventional method. All tests were with coleoptile cells of Avena sativa var. Victory.


1 Research supported by funds from the Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station and by funds from National Science Foundation Grant GB 28124X to R. M. S. Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 369.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M.R.G. Roelfsema, R. Steinmeyer, and R. Hedrich
Discontinuous single electrode voltage-clamp measurements: assessment of clamp accuracy in Vicia faba guard cells
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2001; 52(362): 1933 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Plant Biologists