Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 61:122-126 (1978)
© 1978 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (237)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N. C.
Articles

Osmotic Adjustment in Leaves of Sorghum in Response to Water Deficits 1

Madeleine M. Jones

Neil C. Turner

Department of Environmental Biology, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, Australia, Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, P.O. Box 1600, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, Australia

The relationships among the total water potential, osmotic potential, turgor potential, and relative water content were determined for leaves of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench cvs. `RS 610' and `Shallu') with three different histories of water stress. Plants were adequately watered (control), or the soil was allowed to dry slowly until the predawn leaf water potential reached either –0.4 megapascal (MPa) (treatment A) or –1.6 MPa (treatment B). Severe soil and plant water deficits developed sooner after cessation of watering in `Shallu' than in `RS 610', but no significant differences in osmotic adjustment or tissue water relations were observed between the two cultivars. In both cultivars, the stress treatments altered the relationship between leaf water potential and relative water content, resulting in the previously stressed plants maintaining higher tissue water contents than control plants at the same leaf water potential. The osmotic potential at full turgor in the control sorghum was –0.7 MPa: stress pretreatment significantly lowered the osmotic potential to –1.1 and –1.6 MPa in stress treatments A and B, respectively. As a result of this osmotic adjustment, leaf turgor potentials at a given value of leaf water potential exceeded those of the control plants by 0.15 to 0.30 MPa in treatment A and by 0.5 to 0.65 MPa in treatment B. However, zero turgor potential occurred at approximately the same value of relative water content (94%) irrespective of previous stress history. From the relationship between turgor potential and relative water content there was an approximate doubling of the volumetric elastic modulus, i.e. a halving of tissue elasticity, as a result of stress preconditioning. The influence of stress preconditioning on the moisture release curve is discussed.


1 This work was carried out while one author (M. M. J.) held a Commonwealth Postgraduate Research Award.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. W. Netondo, J. C. Onyango, and E. Beck
Sorghum and Salinity: I. Response of Growth, Water Relations, and Ion Accumulation to NaCl Salinity
Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
J.-K. Zhu, J. Liu, and L. Xiong
Genetic Analysis of Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis: Evidence for a Critical Role of Potassium Nutrition
PLANT CELL, July 1, 1998; 10(7): 1181 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Plant Biologists