Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 61:1017-1022 (1978)
© 1978 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (56)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feierabend, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feierabend, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feierabend, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, B.
Articles

Comparative Investigation of the Action of Several Chlorosis-inducing Herbicides on the Biogenesis of Chloroplasts and Leaf Microbodies

Jürgen Feierabend and Brigitte Schubert

Arbeitsgruppe Pflanzliche Zellphysiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-4630 Bochum, Germany

Seedlings of Triticum aestivum L. and Secale cereale L. were grown in the presence of six different (five having different chemical structures) chlorosis-inducing herbicides: aminotriazole and its derivative SDR 5175, haloxidine, Sandoz 6706, fluometuron, and EMD-IT 5914. Concentrations were applied which allowed the leaves to grow normally and to reach normal total amino nitrogen contents but evoked a complete chlorosis (less than 6% chlorophyll). The effects of the herbicides on the accumulation of several chloroplast constituents and on peroxisomal and mitochondrial marker enzyme activities were compared. Wheat and rye, in general, gave very similar results, wheat being more sensitive to unspecific inhibitory effects.

In dark-grown plants, the herbicides had no or only minor effects on the rRNA pattern and on enzyme activities of the leaves. In the light, all herbicides applied prevented the accumulation of carotenoids and of chloroplastic rRNA. Consequently, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity was virtually absent. After all herbicide treatments in light, the leaves contained only rather low catalase activity. In the presence of aminotriazole and haloxidine, the chloroplast-specific NADP-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and the peroxisomal enzymes glycolate oxidase and hydroxypyruvate reductase had high or even normal activities, as in untreated leaves. In leaves treated with Sandoz 6706, fluometuron, or EMDIT 5914, the activities of the latter three enzymes were, in parallel, only very low. Some herbicides interfered with enzyme activities in vitro, particularly with those of catalase and of glycolate oxidase. Among mitochondrial enzymes, cytochrome c oxidase activity was either unaffected or lower, while fumarase had considerably higher activities in the herbicide-treated, as compared to untreated leaves. The specific effects on peroxisomal enzymes cannot be explained by the hypothesis of herbicide-induced photodestructions in carotene-deficient plastids. Alternative explanations for the genesis of the chlorosis are discussed.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. D. Vecchia, R. Barbato, N. La Rocca, I. Moro, and N. Rascio
Responses to bleaching herbicides by leaf chloroplasts of maize plants grown at different temperatures
J. Exp. Bot., April 15, 2001; 52(357): 811 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Plant Biologists