Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 61:915-917 (1978)
© 1978 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (43)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radmer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ollinger, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radmer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ollinger, O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Radmer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ollinger, O.
Articles

Kinetics and Apparent Km of Oxygen Cycle under Conditions of Limiting Carbon Dioxide Fixation 1

Richard Radmer, Bessel Kok and Otto Ollinger

Martin Marietta Laboratories, 1450 South Rolling Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21227

A mass spectrometer with a membrane inlet was used to monitor light-driven O2 evolution, O2 uptake, and CO2 uptake in suspensions of algae (Scenedesmus obliquus). We observed the following. (a) The rate of O2 uptake, which, in the presence of iodoacetamide, replaces the uptake of CO2, showed a distinct plateau (Vmax) beyond ~30% O2 and was half-maximal at ~8% O2. We concluded that this light-driven O2 uptake process, which does not involve carbon compounds, is saturated at lower O2 concentrations than are photorespiration and glycolate formation. (b) In the absence of inhibitor, O2 evolution was relatively unaffected by the presence or absence of CO2. During the course of CO2 depletion, electron flow to CO2 was replaced by an equivalent flow to O2. (c) There was a distinct delay between the cessation of CO2 uptake and the increase in O2 uptake. We ascribe this delay to the transient utilization of another electron acceptor—possibly bicarbonate or another bound form of CO2.


1 This work was prepared with the support of United States Energy Research and Development Administration Contract No. E(11-1)-3326, and the National Science Foundation Grant No. AER73-03291.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Plant Biologists