Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 64:1015-1021 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (39)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deitzer, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jabben, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deitzer, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jabben, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Deitzer, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jabben, M.
Articles

Kinetics and Time Dependence of the Effect of Far Red Light on the Photoperiodic Induction of Flowering in Wintex Barley 1

Gerald F. Deitzer, Rebecca Hayes and Merten Jabben2

a Smithsonian Institution, Radiation Biology Laboratory, 12441 Parklawn Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20852

Flowering in the long day plant Hordeum vulgare L. var. Wintex barley was enhanced by the addition of far red light to the main light portion of the photoperiod. Far red energy was provided to produce quantum flux ratios (660/730 nm) and phytochrome photoequilibria (Pfr/total phytochrome) equivalent to those reported both beneath a leaf canopy and outside a canopy at twilight. The photoperiodic requirement for long days can be completely eliminated by the addition of far red light. However, both the effect of extending the photoperiod without far red and the addition of far red to 12-hour photoperiods were suboptimal. Maximal stimulation was achieved only when far red was added to continuous light. The duration of the period of maximal apex elongation rate, as well as the reduction of the time required for floral initiation, were saturated by three inductive cycles. When far red energy was provided intermittently during 3 days of continuous light, the ability to respond varied in a circadian manner. This enhancement of flowering by far red appears to be mediated by the "high irradiance response" of phytochrome.


2 Present address: Institut für Biologie II, Universität Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-7800 Freiburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

1 This work was carried out under partial support of the Department of Energy under Contract EY-76-S-05-4241 and was partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinshaft.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. C. Wollenberg, B. Strasser, P. D. Cerdan, and R. M. Amasino
Acceleration of Flowering during Shade Avoidance in Arabidopsis Alters the Balance between FLOWERING LOCUS C-Mediated Repression and Photoperiodic Induction of Flowering
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2008; 148(3): 1681 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Hanumappa, L. H. Pratt, M.-M. Cordonnier-Pratt, and G. F. Deitzer
A Photoperiod-Insensitive Barley Line Contains a Light-Labile Phytochrome B
Plant Physiology, March 1, 1999; 119(3): 1033 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
D. Somers, A. Webb, M Pearson, and S. Kay
The short-period mutant, toc1-1, alters circadian clock regulation of multiple outputs throughout development in Arabidopsis thaliana
Development, January 2, 1998; 125(3): 485 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Plant Biologists