Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 65:797-801 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (162)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tingey, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tingey, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, W. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tingey, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, W. F.
Articles

Influence of Light and Temperature on Monoterpene Emission Rates from Slash Pine

David T. Tingey, Marybeth Manning, Louis C. Grothaus and Walter F. Burns

United States Environmental Protection Agency and Northrop Services Incorporated, 200 S. W. 35th Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97330

There is a growing awareness of vegetation's role as a source of potentially reactive hydrocarbons that may serve as photochemical oxidant precursors. This study assessed the influence of light and temperature, independently, on monoterpene emissions from slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.). Plants were preconditioned in a growth chamber, then transferred to an environmentally controlled gas exchange chamber. Samples of the chamber atmosphere were collected; the monoterpenes were concentrated cryogenically and measured by gas chromatography. Five monoterpenes ({alpha}-pinene, {beta}-pinene, myrcene, limonene, and {beta}-phellandrene) were present in the vapor phase surrounding the plants in sufficient quantity for reliable measurement. Light did not directly influence monoterpene emission rates since the emissions were similar in both the dark and at various light intensities. Monoterpene emission rates increased exponentially with temperature (i. e. emissions depend on temperature in a log-linear manner). The summed emissions of the five monoterpenes ranged from 3 to 21 micrograms C per gram dry weight per hour as temperature was increased from 20 to 46 C. Initially, emission rates from heat-stressed needles were similar to healthy needles, but rates decreased 11% per day. Daily carbon loss through monoterpene emissions accounted for approximately 0.4% of the carbon fixed during photosynthesis.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
U. Niinemets, M. Reichstein, M. Staudt, G. Seufert, and J. D. Tenhunen
Stomatal Constraints May Affect Emission of Oxygenated Monoterpenoids from the Foliage of Pinus pinea
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2002; 130(3): 1371 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. P. Gouinguene and T. C.J. Turlings
The Effects of Abiotic Factors on Induced Volatile Emissions in Corn Plants
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2002; 129(3): 1296 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Llusià and J. Peñuelas
Seasonal patterns of terpene content and emission from seven Mediterranean woody species in field conditions
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2000; 87(1): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. A. Mooney, H. A. MOONEY, P. M. VITOUSEK, and P. A. MATSON
Exchange of Materials Between Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere
Science, November 13, 1987; 238(4829): 926 - 932.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Plant Biologists