Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 65:906-912 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (40)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Datko, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Giovanelli, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Datko, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Giovanelli, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Datko, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Giovanelli, J.
Articles

Lemna paucicostata Hegelm. 6746

DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDIZED GROWTH CONDITIONS SUITABLE FOR BIOCHEMICAL EXPERIMENTATION

Anne H. Datko, S. Harvey Mudd and John Giovanelli

National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20205, Laboratory of General and Comparative Biochemistry, Bethesda, Maryland 20205

Photoautotrophic and mixotrophic growth of Lemna paucicostata Hegelm. 6746 (formerly Lemna perpusilla Torr. 6746) was investigated to establish standardized conditions for biochemical studies. Optimal temperature for growth was 29 to 30 C. The medium used previously (Datko AH, Mudd SH, Giovanelli J 1977 J Biol Chem 252: 3436-3445) was modified by inclusion of NH4Cl, decreasing macronutrient and ethylenediamine tetraacetate concentration, increasing micronutrient concentration, and inclusion of bicarbonate (for photoautotrophic growth) or 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (for mixotrophic growth) buffers. Varying the sulfate concentration between 14 and 1 millimolar had no effect on growth. For photoautotrophic growth in the new medium (medium 4), the effects of CO2 concentration, light intensity, and pH were measured. Under the optimal conditions, a multiplication rate (MR) of 300 to 315, equivalent to a doubling time of 23 to 24 hours was obtained. Addition of glutamine or asparagine did not increase this MR. For mixotrophic growth in low light, the effects of sucrose concentration and pH were determined. Under optimal conditions, MR was 210. A concentration of sucrose less than maximal for growth was chosen for the medium for experiments which will include 14C-labeling of intermediates. MR under these conditions was 184. Growth was equally good in medium 4 and in half-strength Hutner's medium when sulfate was high (0.4 to 1 millimolar), but better in medium 4 when sulfate was low (20 micromolar). Growth rates could be restored to normal in half-strength Hutner's with low sulfate by decreasing the molybdate concentration.

By modifying medium 4 to contain very low amounts of sulfate, and by preconditioning medium and plants, it was shown that there was an increment in plant protein of approximately 2.5 micrograms per nanomole of added MgSO4. Colonies undergoing sulfur limitation exhibited a slow growth rate and a high frond to colony ratio. Molybdate and selenate produced growth inhibition reversible by sulfate. Conditions were developed in which the plants could be maintained indefinitely in the presence of either molybdate or selenate in altered metabolic steady-states with lowered growth rates and protein per frond.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
K. Miwa, M. Serikawa, S. Suzuki, T. Kondo, and T. Oyama
Conserved Expression Profiles of Circadian Clock-related Genes in Two Lemna Species Showing Long-day and Short-day Photoperiodic Flowering Responses
Plant Cell Physiol., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 601 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Plant Biologists