Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 66:809-814 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (71)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blizzard, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blizzard, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blizzard, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Articles

Comparative Resistance of the Soil and the Plant to Water Transport 1

Wayne E. Blizzard

John S. Boyer

Department of Botany, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, Agricultural Research, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, Department of Botany, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

The resistances to liquid water transport in the soil and plant were determined directly and simultaneously from measurements of soil, root, and leaf water potentials and the flux of water through the soil-plant system to the sites of evaporation in the leaf. For soybean (Merr.) transporting water at a steady rate, water potential differences between soil and root were smaller than between root and leaf over the range of soil water potentials from –0.2 to –11 bars. As soil water was depleted, water flow through the soil and plant decreased to one-tenth the maximum rate, but both the soil resistance and plant resistance increased. The plant resistance remained larger than the soil resistance over the entire range of soil water availability. Previous suggestions that the soil is the major resistance have ignored the increase in plant resistance and/or assumed root densities that were too low.


1 This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant PCM 76-11026 (to J. S. B.).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. S. Sperry, V. Stiller, and U. G. Hacke
Xylem Hydraulics and the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum: Opportunities and Unresolved Issues
Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1362 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Plant Biologists