This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (50) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Silk, W. K. Articles by Wagner, K. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Silk, W. K. Articles by Wagner, K. K. Agricola Articles by Silk, W. K. Articles by Wagner, K. K.

Articles

Growth-sustaining Water Potential Distributions in the Primary Corn Root

A NONCOMPARTMENTED CONTINUUM MODEL ¹

Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California 95616

An equation is derived from transport theory to relate local growth rate to local water potential in an expanding tissue. For a noncompartmented continuum model, the relative elemental growth rate (L) equals the divergence of the tensor product of hydraulic conductivity () and the gradient of water potential, , i.e. L = [ · ]. This equation is solved numerically using published values of L and to show the water potential distribution which can sustain the observed growth pattern in the primary root of Zea mays L. The water potential required to sustain growth decreases from the outside to the inside of the root, and the longitudinal profile shows most negative values near the location of the highest growth rate. A cell originally located near the apex experiences a loss and then a gain in water potential as it is displaced through the growth zone.

The approach differs from previous formulations in two respects: the assumption of spatial heterogeneity in growth rate, and the solution for spatial (site-specific) rather than material (cell-specific) values of water potential. The role of air spaces and of components (wall and possibly cytoplasm) of the water-conducting pathway which do not accumulate water remains to be clarified; and, as in earlier work, the most uncertain aspects of the analysis are probably the values for hydraulic conductivity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. S. Wiegers, A. Y. Cheer, and W. K. Silk Modeling the Hydraulics of Root Growth in Three Dimensions with Phloem Water Sources Plant Physiology, August 1, 2009; 150(4): 2092 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. G. Tumlinson, H. Liu, W. K. Silk, and J. W. Hopmans Thermal Neutron Computed Tomography of Soil Water and Plant Roots Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1234 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Proseus, G.-L. Zhu, and J. S. Boyer Turgor, temperature and the growth of plant cells: using Chara corallina as a model system J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2000; 51(350): 1481 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Hsiao and L.-K. Xu Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2000; 51(350): 1595 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. DESCHAMP and T. J. COOKE Leaf Dimorphism in Aquatic Angiosperms: Significance of Turgor Pressure and Cell Expansion Science, February 4, 1983; 219(4584): 505 - 507. [Abstract] [PDF]