Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 67:484-488 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (97)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ackerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ackerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, R. R.
Articles

Osmoregulation in Cotton in Response to Water Stress 1

I. ALTERATIONS IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS, LEAF CONDUCTANCE, TRANSLOCATION, AND ULTRASTRUCTURE

Robert C. Ackerson and Richard R. Hebert

Central Research and Development Department, Experimental Station, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19898

Cotton plants subjected to a series of water deficits exhibited stress adaptation in the form of osmoregulation when plants were subjected to a subsequent drying cycle. After adaptation, the leaf water potential coinciding with zero turgor was considerably lower than in plants that had never experienced a water stress. The relationship between leaf turgor and leaf water potential depended on leaf age.

Nonstomatal factors severely limited photosynthesis in adapted plants at high leaf water potential. Nonetheless, adapted plants maintained photosynthesis to a much lower leaf water potential than did control plants, in part because of increased stomatal conductance at low leaf water potentials. Furthermore, adapted plants continued to translocate recently derived photosynthate to lower leaf water potentials, compared with control plants.

Stress preconditioning modified cellular ultrastructure. Chloroplasts of fully turgid adapted leaves contained extremely large starch granules, seemed swollen, and had some breakdown of thylakoid membrane structure. In addition, cells of adapted leaves appeared to have smaller vacuoles and greater nonosmotic cell volume than did control plants.


1 Contribution 2803 from the Central Research and Development Department, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. A. Pline, R. Wells, G. Little, K. L. Edmisten, and J. W. Wilcut
Glyphosate and Water-Stress Effects on Fruiting and Carbohydrates in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton
Crop Sci., May 1, 2003; 43(3): 879 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. Jia, J. Zhang, and J. Liang
Initiation and regulation of water deficit-induced abscisic acid accumulation in maize leaves and roots: cellular volume and water relations
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2001; 52(355): 295 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. S. Boyer
Plant Productivity and Environment
Science, October 29, 1982; 218(4571): 443 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Plant Biologists