Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 67:733-739 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandoli, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandoli, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, W. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mandoli, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, W. R.
Articles

Phytochrome Control of Two Low-Irradiance Responses in Etiolated Oat Seedlings 1

Dina F. Mandoli and Winslow R. Briggs

Carnegie Institution of Washington, 290 Panama Street, Stanford, California 94305

Light-induced coleoptile stimulation and mesocotyl suppression in etiolated Avena sativa (cv. Lodi) has been quantitated. Etiolated seedlings showed the greatest response to light when they were illuminated 48 to 56 hours after imbibition. Two low-irradiance photoresponses for each tissue have been described. Red light was 10 times more effective than green and 1,000 times more effective than far red light in evoking these responses. The first response, which resulted in a 45% mesocotyl suppression and 30% coleoptile stimulation, had a threshold at 10–14 einsteins per square centimeter and was saturated at 3.0 x 10–12 einsteins per square centimeter of red light. This very low-irradiance response could be induced by red, green, or far red light and was not photoreversible. Reciprocity failed if the duration of the red illumination exceeded 10 minutes. The low-irradiance response which resulted in 80% mesocotyl suppression and 60% coleoptile stimulation, had a threshold at 10–10 einsteins per square centimeter and was saturated at 3.0 x 10–8 einsteins per square centimeter of red light. A complete low-irradiance response could be induced by either red or green light but not by far red light. This response could be reversed by a far red dose 30 times greater than that of the initial red dose for both coleoptiles and mesocotyls. Reciprocity failed if the duration of the red illumination exceeded 170 minutes. Both of these responses can be explained by the action of phytochrome.


1 Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Plant Biology, Publication No. 707.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
I.-S. Han, T.-S. Tseng, W. Eisinger, and W. R. Briggs
Phytochrome A Regulates the Intracellular Distribution of Phototropin 1-Green Fluorescent Protein in Arabidopsis thaliana
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2008; 20(10): 2835 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
K. M. Folta and S. A. Maruhnich
Green light: a signal to slow down or stop
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2007; 58(12): 3099 - 3111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Rosler, I. Klein, and M. Zeidler
Arabidopsis fhl/fhy1 double mutant reveals a distinct cytoplasmic action of phytochrome A
PNAS, June 19, 2007; 104(25): 10737 - 10742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Dhingra, D. H. Bies, K. R. Lehner, and K. M. Folta
Green Light Adjusts the Plastid Transcriptome during Early Photomorphogenic Development
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1256 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
L. D. Talbott, J. W. Hammad, L. C. Harn, V. H. Nguyen, J. Patel, and E. Zeiger
Reversal by Green Light of Blue Light-stimulated Stomatal Opening in Intact, Attached Leaves of Arabidopsis Operates Only in the Potassium-dependent, Morning Phase of Movement
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 332 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. M. Folta
Green Light Stimulates Early Stem Elongation, Antagonizing Light-Mediated Growth Inhibition
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2004; 135(3): 1407 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
L. D. Talbott, I. J. Shmayevich, Y. Chung, J. W. Hammad, and E. Zeiger
Blue Light and Phytochrome-Mediated Stomatal Opening in the npq1 and phot1 phot2 Mutants of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1522 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
L. D. Talbott, J. Zhu, S. W. Han, and E. Zeiger
Phytochrome and Blue Light-Mediated Stomatal Opening in the Orchid, Paphiopedilum
Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2002; 43(6): 639 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
T. Shinomura, K. Uchida, and M. Furuya
Elementary Processes of Photoperception by Phytochrome A for High-Irradiance Response of Hypocotyl Elongation in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2000; 122(1): 147 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R A Sharrock and P H Quail
Novel phytochrome sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana: structure, evolution, and differential expression of a plant regulatory photoreceptor family.
Genes & Dev., November 1, 1989; 3(11): 1745 - 1757.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. S. KAUFMAN, W. F. THOMPSON, and W. R. BRIGGS
Different Red Light Requirements for Phytochrome-Induced Accumulation of cab RNA and rbcS RNA
Science, December 21, 1984; 226(4681): 1447 - 1449.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Plant Biologists