Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 67:740-743 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinhofs, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinhofs, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinhofs, A.
Articles

Nitrate Utilization by Nitrate Reductase-deficient Barley Mutants 1

Robert L. Warner

A. Kleinhofs

Department of Agronomy and Soils, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, Department of Agronomy and Soils, and Program in Genetics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164

Two nitrate reductase-deficient barley mutants were studied for growth on nitrate and ammonium sources of nitrogen and for resistance to chlorate. Although nitrate reductase-deficient mutants in some species are chlorate-resistant (unable to reduce chlorate to chlorite), the barley mutants used in these studies when grown on nitrate and treated with chlorate were only slightly more resistant to chlorate than the control. When grown to maturity on vermiculite supplemented with either nitrate or ammonium nutrient solutions, the mutants produced as much dry weight and reduced nitrogen per plant as the control. The in vivo and in vitro nitrate reductase activities in the roots and shoots of the mutants grown on nitrate were consistently less than 10% of the control. To avoid the possibility that the mutants received reduced nitrogen from microbial sources, excised embryos were cultured under sterile conditions. Again the mutants were capable of growth and reduced nitrogen accumulation with nitrate as the sole source of nitrogen. In spite of the low apparent nitrate reductase activity, the nitrate reductase-deficient mutants are capable of substantial nitrate reduction.


1 Scientific Paper 5718, College of Agriculture Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington. Projects 0233 and 4233. This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant PCM 78-16025.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
U. S. Lea, M.-T. Leydecker, I. Quillere, C. Meyer, and C. Lillo
Posttranslational Regulation of Nitrate Reductase Strongly Affects the Levels of Free Amino Acids and Nitrate, whereas Transcriptional Regulation Has Only Minor Influence
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2006; 140(3): 1085 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Plant Biologists