Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 67:815-819 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bravo-F, P.
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bravo-F, P.
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, E. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bravo-F, P.
Right arrow Articles by Uribe, E. G.
Articles

Temperature Dependence of the Concentration Kinetics of Absorption of Phosphate and Potassium in Corn Roots 1,2

Pedro Bravo-F3 and Ernest G. Uribe

Department of Botany, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164

The effect of temperature on respiration and kinetics of H2PO4 and K+ uptake in corn roots was determined in the range of 2 to 42 C. The response of uptake to temperature, determined from Q10 and activation energy (Ea) data, for the anion and the cation differ significantly, especially in the range of uptake mechanism (Mech.) I. At 2.5 micromolar the Ea for K+ uptake below the 13 C transition is 29.3 kilocalories per mole. As the K+ concentration is increased, Ea declines and at 0.25 millimolar is 21.6 kilocalories per mole. Accompanying this change in Ea is a shifting of the apparent transition temperature from 13 to 17 C. Above the temperature transition the Ea's for K+ uptake in the Mech. I range are quite low (3.0) and this value is unchanged by increases of K+ concentration to 0.25 millimolar. In the range of Mech. II above 1 millimolar K+ the temperature transitions are not seen and plots become linear. The Ea's show an increasing trend from 4.7 at 1 millimolar to 6.1 at 50 millimolar. The uptake of H2PO4 is much more temperature sensitive having a constant Ea at concentrations in the Mech. I range below the 13 C temperature transition. The Arrhenius plots reveal a second transition at 22 C and the Ea for this segment is 21.0. Above the second transition the Ea remains high (10.0) and is constant in the range of Mech. I. In the range of Mech. II there is a concentration dependent decline in Ea for H2PO4 uptake (22.7 at 1.0 millimolar to 1.0 at 50 millimolar). There is no definable low temperature transition at these concentrations. Ion uptake is found to be much more sensitive to low temperature than respiration in this chill-sensitive species. The data suggest that the low temperature reduction of ion transport is more closely related to restriction of function of active transport systems than to either respiration or membrane permeability.


3 Permanent address: Departamento de Botanica, Facultad de Agronomia, U.C.V., Maracay, Edo. Aragua, Venezuela.

1 Partially supported by a grant from the Universidad Central de Venezuela to P. Bravo-F.

2 This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Noe Higinbotham our dear friend and valued mentor in research.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Chassot and W. Richner
Root Characteristics and Phosphorus Uptake of Maize Seedlings in a Bilayered Soil
Agron. J., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 118 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. E. Gavito, P. S. Curtis, T. N. Mikkelsen, and I. Jakobsen
Interactive effects of soil temperature, atmospheric carbon dioxide and soil N on root development, biomass and nutrient uptake of winter wheat during vegetative growth
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2001; 52(362): 1913 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Plant Biologists