Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 67:1054-1058 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eustice, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Shrift, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eustice, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Shrift, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eustice, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Shrift, A.
Articles

Selenium Toxicity: Aminoacylation and Peptide Bond Formation with Selenomethionine 1

David C. Eustice2, Fredrick J. Kull and Alex Shrift3

Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York 13901

Selenomethionine and methionine were compared as substrates for in vitro aminoacylation, ribosome binding, and peptide bond formation with preparations from wheat germ. Selenomethionine paralleled methionine in all steps of the translation process except peptide bond formation. Peptide bond formation with the initiating species of tRNAMet demonstrated that selenomethionyl-tRNAMet was less effective as a substrate than was methionyl-tRNAfMet. Participation of selenomethionine in the initiation process of translation could be expected to reduce the overall rate of protein synthesis and might aid in explaining selenium toxicity in selenium-sensitive plants.


2 Present address: Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755.

3 To whom all correspondence should be addressed.

1 This research was supported by Grant 00807 to A. S. from the National Institutes of Health, and is part of the dissertation submitted by D. C. E. for the PhD at the State University of New York at Binghamton.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol PlantHome page
C. M. Cohu, S. E. Abdel-Ghany, K. A. Gogolin Reynolds, A. M. Onofrio, J. R. Bodecker, J. A. Kimbrel, K. K. Niyogi, and M. Pilon
Copper Delivery by the Copper Chaperone for Chloroplast and Cytosolic Copper/Zinc-Superoxide Dismutases: Regulation and Unexpected Phenotypes in an Arabidopsis Mutant
Mol Plant, November 1, 2009; 2(6): 1336 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Tamaoki, J. L. Freeman, and E. A.H. Pilon-Smits
Cooperative Ethylene and Jasmonic Acid Signaling Regulates Selenite Resistance in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 1219 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. El Kassis, N. Cathala, H. Rouached, P. Fourcroy, P. Berthomieu, N. Terry, and J.-C. Davidian
Characterization of a Selenate-Resistant Arabidopsis Mutant. Root Growth as a Potential Target for Selenate Toxicity
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2007; 143(3): 1231 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Plant Biologists