Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 67:910-916 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Imbrie, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Imbrie, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Imbrie, C. W.
Articles

Induction and Characterization of Chlorate-resistant Strains of Rosa damascena Cultured Cells 1

Terence M. Murphy and Catherine W. Imbrie

Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, California 95616

The sensitivity of Rosa damascena cultured cells to chlorate was measured by plating samples of suspensions in agar containing NaClO3. This sensitivity depended on the age of the cultures that were plated. Chlorate-resistant colonies isolated from 5- to 7-day cultures retained their resistance through many generations of growth in medium lacking NaClO3; they also retained resistance when mixed with sensitive cells. Treating cell aggregates with ultraviolet (UV) light (254 nanometers), or UV light (360 nanometers) in the presence of 4'-methoxymethyltrioxsalen, increased the proportion that was resistant to NaClO3. However, the amount of increase was low (three times) and required very specific doses of UV light. The UV treatments did not select for chlorate-resistant cells over chlorate-sensitive cells. The data suggested that UV had induced mutations leading to chlorate resistance. Approximately 15% of the resistant strains did not grow on medium containing nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. These strains lacked ability to reduce chlorate to chlorite. This observation supports the current idea that chlorate toxicity depends on the activity of nitrate reductase. Approximately 85% of the resistant strains grew on medium containing nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. These strains lost catalase activity following chlorate treatment, indicating that they took up and reduced chlorate. These strains have a mechanism for tolerating chlorate and its reduction products, rather than avoiding them.


1 Supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant PCM 76-19954. A preliminary communication of a portion of these data was presented at the 4th International Congress of Plant Cell and Tissue Culture, Calgary, Alberta, 20-25 August 1978.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Plant Biologists