Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 68:854-856 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (44)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purvis, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barmore, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Purvis, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barmore, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Purvis, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barmore, C. R.
Articles

Involvement of Ethylene in Chlorophyll Degradation in Peel of Citrus Fruits 1

Albert C. Purvis and Charles R. Barmore

University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, Florida 33850

The effect of ethylene on chlorophyll degradation in the peel of Robinson tangerine (X Citrus reticulata Blanco) and calamondin (X Citrofortunellamitis [Blanco] Ingram and Moore) fruits was studied. The chlorophyll degrading system in the peel of these two citrus species was not self-sustaining but required ethylene to function. Chlorophyll degradation ceased immediately when fruit were removed from ethylene and held in ethylene-free air at 0.2 atmospheric pressure. However, at atmospheric pressure, chlorophyll degradation continued for 24 hours in the absence of exogenous ethylene. Although chlorophyllase levels were negatively correlated with chlorophyll content in the peel (r = –0.981; P < 0.01), the level of chlorophyllase activity did not change when fruit were removed from ethylene, even though chlorophyll degradation had stopped. From these observations, it was concluded that ethylene is necessary for chlorophyll degradation in the two species of citrus studied, but its primary role is not solely for the induction of chlorophyllase activity.


1 Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations Journal Series No. 3016.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
T. Azoulay Shemer, S. Harpaz-Saad, E. Belausov, N. Lovat, O. Krokhin, V. Spicer, K. G. Standing, E. E. Goldschmidt, and Y. Eyal
Citrus Chlorophyllase Dynamics at Ethylene-Induced Fruit Color-Break: A Study of Chlorophyllase Expression, Posttranslational Processing Kinetics, and in Situ Intracellular Localization
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2008; 148(1): 108 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. F. Marcos, L. Gonzalez-Candelas, and L. Zacarias
Involvement of ethylene biosynthesis and perception in the susceptibility of citrus fruits to Penicillium digitatum infection and the accumulation of defence-related mRNAs
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2005; 56(418): 2183 - 2193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Plant Biologists