Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 69:781-788 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keifer, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keifer, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keifer, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, W. J.
Articles

Potassium Channels in Chara corallina1

CONTROL AND INTERACTION WITH THE ELECTROGENIC H+ PUMP

David W. Keifer and William J. Lucas

Department of Botany, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616

Plasmalemma electrical properties were used to investigate K+ transport and its control in internodal cells of Chara corallina Klein ex Willd., em R.D.W. Cell exposure to solutions containing 10 mM KCl caused the potential, normally –250 millivolts (average), to depolarize in two steps. The first step was a 21 millivolt depolarization that lasted from 1 to 40 minutes. The second step started with an action potential and left the membrane potential at –91 millivolts, with a 10-fold reduction in resistance. We suggest that the second step was caused by the opening of K+ -channels in the membrane. This lowered the resistance and provided a current pathway that partially short-circuited the electrogenic pump. Although largely short-circuited, the electrogenic pump was still operating as indicated by: (a) the depolarized potential of –91 millivolts was more negative than EK (=–42 millivolts in 10 mM K+); (b) a large net K+ uptake occurred while the cell was depolarized; (c) both the electrogenic pump inhibitor, diethylstilbestrol, and the sulfhydryl-reagent N-ethylmaleimide (which increased the passive membrane permeability) further depolarized the potential in 10 mM KCl.

A two-phase recovery back to normal cell potentials occurred upon lowering the K+ concentration from 10 to 0.2 mM. The first phase was an apparent Nernst potential response to the change in external K+ concentration. The second phase was a sudden hyperpolarization accompanied by a large increase in membrane resistance. We attribute the second phase to the closing of K+ -channels and the removal of the associated short-circuiting effect on the electrogenic pump, thereby allowing the membrane to hyperpolarize. Further experiments indicated that the K+ -channel required Ca2+ for normal closure, but other ions could substitute, including: Na+, tetraethylammonium, and 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine. Apparently, K+ -channel conductance is determined by competition between Ca2+ and K+ for a control (gating?) binding site.


1 Supported by National Science Foundation Grant PCM 8003133 to W. J. L. and D. W. K.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Plant Biologists