Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 70:460-464 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silk, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silk, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Silk, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, R. E.
Articles

Mechanical Properties of the Rice Panicle 1

Wendy Kuhn Silk, Lily L. Wang2 and Robert E. Cleland

Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California 95616, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, Department of Botany, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

Curvature, bending moment, and second moment of stem cross-sectional area were evaluated from photographic data and used to compute flexural rigidity and Young's modulus in the panicle rachis of rice, Oryza sativa L. `M-101.' Flexural rigidity C, and its components E, Young's modulus, and I, the moment of inertia of the area about the neutral axis, were evaluated 1.5 cm (tip), 9.5 cm (mid), and 16.5 cm (base) from the tip of the panicle rachis. In dynes per square centimeter, C increases from 1.1 x 103 near the tip to 1.09 x 104 in the middle to 5.35 x 104 in the basal region of the rachis. Of the components of C, the I changes have the larger effect, increasing from 2.12 x 10–7 centimeters4 near the tip to 8.21 x 10–7 centimeters4 in mid regions to 6.0 x 10–6 centimeters4 in the basal regions. Young's modulus increases from 4.8 x 109 dynes per square centimeter near the tip to 1.4 x 1010 dynes per square centimeter in mid regions then falls to 7.4 x 109 dynes per square centimeter near the base of the main stem. Values of Young's modulus from Instron experiments were in satisfactory agreement with values calculated from the beam bending equation. Flexural rigidity in the curved region of the panicle proved independent of panicle load, indicating that the dissected panicle rachis behaves in some respects as a tapered loaded beam.


2 Present address: Clorox Technical Center, Pleasanton, CA 94556.

1 Supported by grants from the California Agricultural Experiment Station and PCM 78-23-710 from the National Science Foundation to W. K. Silk and Contract DE-AM06-76 RL02225 from the Department of Energy to R. E. Cleland.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Coutand and B. Moulia
Biomechanical study of the effect of a controlled bending on tomato stem elongation: local strain sensing and spatial integration of the signal
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2000; 51(352): 1825 - 1842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Pierce, C.M. Stirling, and R. Baxter
The influence of secondary senescence processes within the culm of a pseudoviviparous grass (Poa alpina var. vivipara L.) on the supply of water to propagules
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2000; 51(347): 1067 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. O. Hay, B. Moulia, B. Lane, M. Freeling, and W. K. Silk
Biomechanical analysis of the Rolled (RLD) leaf phenotype of maize
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2000; 87(5): 625 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Niklas
The mechanical role of bark
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 1999; 86(4): 465 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Plant Biologists