Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 70:912-916 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cordonnier, M.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cordonnier, M.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, L. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cordonnier, M.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, L. H.
Articles

Comparative Phytochrome Immunochemistry as Assayed by Antisera against Both Monocotyledonous and Dicotyledonous Phytochrome 1,2,3

Marie-Michèle Cordonnier4 and Lee H. Pratt

Botany Department, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602

Preparation and characterization of antisera against lettuce (Lactuca sativa L., cv. Grand Rapids) and pea (Pisum sativum L., cv. Alaska) phytochrome is described. These antisera, together with previously obtained antisera against zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L., cv. Black Beauty) and oat (Avena sativa L., cv. Garry) phytochrome, were used to compare by Ouchterlony double immunodiffusion phytochrome isolated from etiolated lettuce, pea, bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. Taylor Horticultural Bush), zucchini, oat and rye (Secale cereale L., cv. Balbo) seedlings. Cross reactivity between monocotyledonous phytochrome and antidicotyledonous-phytochrome serum and between dicotyledonous phytochrome and antimonocotyledonous-phytochrome serum was always weak or not perceptible by this assay. Among the four dicotyledonous phytochromes examined, pea and bean were the most similar immunochemically as anticipated. Pea and lettuce phytochrome somewhat unexpectedly also exhibited similar immunochemical reactivity. Zucchini phytochrome by contrast was immunochemically distinct from pea, bean, and lettuce phytochrome, although it did react with all three antidicotyledonous-phytochrome sera. Initial attempts to identify immunoglobulins that would recognize phytochrome regardless of its source indicated that they may exist. Such immunoglobulins are of interest because they might react with one or more determinants that could be part of an active site of phytochrome. These immunoglobulins, once isolated, could thus serve as a potential probe for the active site of phytochrome.


4 Present address: Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale, Université de Genève, 3 place de l'Université, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

1 We dedicate this paper to the memory of Sterling B. Hendricks.

2 Supported by National Science Foundation Grants PCM77-23584 and PCM79-21568 and by cooperative research agreement number 58-32U40-116 with the United States Department of Agriculture.

3 A preliminary report of a portion of this work was presented at the Annual European Symposium on Photomorphogenesis, Antwerp, Belgium, 1979.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Plant Biologists