This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (30) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Keeley, J. E. Articles by Bowes, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Keeley, J. E. Articles by Bowes, G. Agricola Articles by Keeley, J. E. Articles by Bowes, G.

Articles

Gas Exchange Characteristics of the Submerged Aquatic Crassulacean Acid Metabolism Plant, Isoetes howellii¹

Department of Biology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California 90041, Department of Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611

The submerged aquatic plant Isoetes howellii Engelmann possesses Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) comparable to that known from terrestrial CAM plants. Infrared gas analysis of submerged leaves showed Isoetes was capable of net CO₂ uptake in both light and dark. CO₂ uptake rates were a function of CO₂ levels in the medium. At 2,500 microliters CO₂ per liter (gas phase, equivalent to 1.79 milligrams per liter aqueous phase), Isoetes leaves showed continuous uptake in both the light and dark. At this CO₂ level, photosynthetic rates were light saturated at about 10% full sunlight and were about 3-fold greater than dark CO₂ uptake rates. In the dark, CO₂ uptake rates were also a function of length of time in the night period. Measurements of dark CO₂ uptake showed that, at both 2,500 and 500 microliters CO₂ per liter, rates declined during the night period. At the higher CO₂ level, dark CO₂ uptake rates at 0600 h were 75% less than at 1800 h. At 500 microliters CO₂ per liter, net CO₂ uptake in the dark at 1800 h was replaced by net CO₂ evolution in the dark at 0600 h. At both CO₂ levels, the overnight decline in net CO₂ uptake was marked by periodic bursts of accelerated CO₂ uptake. CO₂ uptake in the light was similar at 1% and 21% O₂, and this held for leaves intact as well as leaves split longitudinally. Estimating the contribution of light versus dark CO₂ uptake to the total carbon gain is complicated by the diurnal flux in CO₂ availability under field conditions.