Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 72:368-375 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schefczik, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schiebe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schefczik, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schiebe, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schefczik, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schiebe, M.
Articles

Continuous Registration of Membrane Input Resistances of Small Plant Cells Using a Double-Pulse Current Clamp Technique for Single-Electrode Impalements 1,2

Comparison with the Conventional Two-Electrode Method

Kurt Schefczik3, Wilhelm Simonis4 and Michael Schiebe

Lehrstuhl Botanik 1, Universität Würzburg, D-8700 Würzburg, Federal Republic of Germany, Abteilung für Angewandte Physiologie, Universität Ulm, D-7900 Ulm/Donau, Federal Republic of Germany

To measure the cell input resistance in Elodea leaf cells, a new single-microelectrode method was explored by comparing the results with conventional two-microelectrode experiments. The new method takes advantage of the difference in the frequency response curves between electrode and cell impedances. By application of electrical stimuli, which contain specific frequency bands, the different impedances can be analyzed separately. To get a distinct separation in the frequency response of cell and electrode, respectively, the electrode capacitance has to be compensated during the impalement. Different time constants of the cell membrane can be accounted for by adjustment of the stimulus length. It is shown that both the single- and the double-electrode method yield the same results, even if the cell input resistances change considerably during the course of the experiment. This demonstrates the usefulness of the new single-electrode method for continuous measurements of cell membrane resistances, especially in cells so small that the double-electrode method is no longer applicable.


3 Present address: Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung mbH, Abteilung für Physiologie, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-8042 Neuherberg b. München, F.R.G.

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

1 Dedicated to the memory of Prof. Dr. Noe Highinbotham.

2 Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Si 7/41).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M.R.G. Roelfsema, R. Steinmeyer, and R. Hedrich
Discontinuous single electrode voltage-clamp measurements: assessment of clamp accuracy in Vicia faba guard cells
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2001; 52(362): 1933 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
N Moran, G Ehrenstein, K Iwasa, C Bare, and C Mischke
Ion channels in plasmalemma of wheat protoplasts
Science, November 16, 1984; 226(4676): 835 - 838.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Plant Biologists